Chapter 7: Technology’s Influence on Parent-Child Relationships

7.2 References

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Aloia, L. S., & Warren, R. (2019). Quality parent–child relationships: The role of parenting style and online relational maintenance behaviors. Communication Reports, 32(2), 43-56.

Auxier, B., Anderson, M., Perrin, A., and Turner, E. (2020, July 28). Parenting Kids in the Age of Screens. Pew Internet and American Life.

Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1–103. doi:10.1037/h0030372

Blackwell, E., Gardiner, and Schoenebeck, S. (2016). Managing expectations: Technology tensions among parents and teens. CSCW ‘16, San Francisco, CA.

Blum-Ross, A., Donoso, V., Dinh, T., Mascheroni, G., O’Neill, B., Riesmeyer, C., and Stoilova, M. (2018). Looking forward: Technological and social change in the lives of European children and young people. Report for the ICT Coalition for Children Online. Brussels: ICT Coalition.

Blum-Ross, A. and Livingstone, S. (2017). “Sharenting,” parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self. POPULAR COMMUNICATION. VOL. 15, NO. 2, 110–125

Bornstein, M. H. (2012). Cultural approaches to parenting. Parenting12(2-3), 212-221.

Brito, R., Francisco, R., Dias, P., and Chaudron, S. (2017). Family dynamics in digital homes: The role played by parental mediation in young children’s digital practices around 14 European countries. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(4), 271-280.

Bumpass and Werner Matthew F. Bumpus & Nicole E. Werner (2009) Maternal Rule-Setting for Children’s Internet Use, Marriage & Family Review, 45:6-8, 845-865, DOI: 10.1080/01494920903224442

Carter, S. P., and Renshaw, K. D. (2016). Spousal communication during military deployments: A review. Journal of Family Issues, 37(16), 2309-2332.

Casimiro, C., and Nico, M. (2018). From object to instrument: Technologies as tools for family relations and family research. In Casimiro C. and Neves B. (Eds.), Connecting Families: Information and Communication Technologies, generations, and the life course (pp. 133- 156). Bristol: Bristol University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv2867xm.14

CommonsenseMedia (2016). The Commonsense Census: Plugged-in Parents of Tweens and Teens, Commonsense Media. Retrieved from

Connell, S. L., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2015). Parental co-use of media technology with their young children in the USA. Journal of Children and Media, 9(1), 5-21.

Correa, T. (2014). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: Exploring how youths influence their parents’ digital media use with dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 64, 103–124

Coyne, S. M., Radesky, J., Collier, K. M., Gentile, D. A., Ruh Linder, J., Nathanson, A. I., Rasmussen, E. E., Reich, S. M., and Rogers, J. (2017). Parenting and digital media. Pediatrics, 140, s112–s116. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1758N

Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (2017). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. In Interpersonal development (pp. 161-170). Routledge.

Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 487–496.

Dworkin, J., Hessel, H. and LeBoeuf, S. (2019). ​​The Use of Communication Technology in the Context of Adolescent and Family Development: An Integration of Family and Media Theories. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 11: 510–523 DOI:10.1111/jftr.12350

Eisenberg, A. R. (1992). Conflicts between mothers and their young children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 21–43

Ferreira, E., Ponte, C., & Castro, T. S. (2017, November). ICT and gender: Parental mediation strategies. In 2017 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Flores, D., & Barroso, J. (2017). 21st century parent–child sex communication in the United States: A process review. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(4-5), 532-548.

Ganong, L. H., Coleman, M., Feistman, R., Jamison, T. and Markham, M. S. (2012) Communication technology and postdivorce coparenting, Family Relations, 61(3): 397‒409,

Goldberg, A. E., Brodzinsky, D., Singer, J., & Crozier, P. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on child welfare-involved families: Implications for parent–child reunification and child welfare professionals. Developmental Child Welfare, 3(3), 203-224.

Harach, L. D., & Kuczynski, L. J. (2005). Construction and maintenance of parent–child relationships: Bidirectional contributions from the perspective of parents. Infant and Child Development: An International Journal of Research and Practice14(4), 327-343.

Heck, S. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2001). Agency and communion in the structure of parental representations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76(1), 180-184.

Helsper, E.J., Kalmus, V., Hasebrink, U., Sagvari, B. and de Haan, J. (2013) Country classification: Opportunities, risks, harm and parental mediation. London: EU Kids Online, LSE

Hessel, H., & Dworkin, J. (2018). Emerging adults’ use of communication technology with family members: A systematic review. Adolescent Research Review, 3(3), 357-373

Jarvenpaa, S., & Lang, K. (2005). Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology. Information Systems Management, 22(4), 7–23.

Karraker, M. (2015). Global families in a digital age. In C. Breuss. (Ed.) Families in a Digital World. NY: Peter Lang., 55-75.

Katz, V. S. (2010). How children of immigrants use media to connect their families to the community. Journal of Children and Media, 4, 298–315

Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 323–351

Lanigan, J. D. (2009). A Sociotechnological Model for Family Research and Intervention: How Information and Communication Technologies Affect Family Life. Marriage & Family Review, 45(6-8), 587–609. doi:10.1080/01494920903224194

Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S., and Lagae, K. (2015). How Parents of Young Children Manage Digital Devices at Home: The Role of Income, Education and Parental Style. London: EU Kids Online.

Livingstone, S. (2009). Youthful experts. In S. Livingstone (Ed.), Children and the internet (pp. 33– 62). Malden, MA: Polity Press.

McCurdy, A. L., Benito-Gomez, M., Lee, G. Y., & Fletcher, A. C. (2022). College Students’ Perceptions of Communication Technology Use and Parent–Child Relationships. Emerging Adulthood, 21676968211060954.

McDaniel, B. T. (2019). Parent distraction with phones, reasons for use, and impacts on parenting and child outcomes: A review of the emerging research. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 72–80.

Miller-Ott, A. E., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2014). Cell phone usage expectations, closeness, and relationship satisfaction between parents and their emerging adults in college. Emerging Adulthood, 2(4), 313–323. 2167696814550195

Naab, Thorsten (2018). From Media Trusteeship to Parental Mediation. The Parental Development of Parental Mediation in Giovanna Mascheroni, Cristina Ponte & Ana Jorge (eds.) Digital Parenting. The Challenges for Families in the Digital Age. Göteborg: Nordicom. (p. 93-102)

Navarro, J. and Tudge, J. (2022). Technologizing bronfenbrenner: neo-ecological theory. Current Psychology, 1-17.

Nelissen, S. and Van den Bulck, J. (2017): When digital natives instruct digital immigrants: active guidance of parental media use by children and conflict in the family.  Information, Communication & Society, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281993

Nikken, P., & Opree, S. J. (2018). Guiding young children’s digital media use: SES-differences in mediation concerns and competence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(6), 1844-1857.

Odgers, C. (2018). Smartphones are bad for some teens, not all. Nature 554, 432-434 (2018) doi:

Page, Jeffery C. (2021). “It’s really difficult. We’ve only got each other to talk to.” Monitoring, mediation, and good parenting in Australia in the digital age. Journal of Children and Media, 15(2), 202-217.

Ramsey, M. A., Gentzler, A. L., Morey, J. N., Oberhauser, A. M., & Westerman, D. (2013). College students’ use of communication technology with parents: Comparisons between two cohorts in 2009 and 2011. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(10), 747–752.

Rudi, J. H., & Dworkin, J. (2018). Parents’ and youths’ solicitation and disclosure of information in today’s digital age. Journal of Youth Development, 13(4), 5-28.

Saini, M., & Polak, S. (2018). The Benefits, Drawbacks, and Safety Considerations in Digital Parent–Child Relationships: An Exploratory Survey of the Views of Legal and Mental Health Professionals in Family Law. Family Court Review, 56(4), 597-606.

Samual, A., (2017). Yes, smartphones are destroying a generation, but not of kids. The Digital Voyage. August 8.

Shin, J. Y., Rheu, M., Huh-Yoo, J., & Peng, W. (2021). Designing technologies to support parent-child relationships: a review of current findings and suggestions for future directions. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5 (CSCW2), 1-31.

Smetana, J. G. (2017). Current research on parenting styles, dimensions, and beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 19-25.

Tippet, K. (Host). (2017, July). Danah boyd. The internet of the good the bad and the ugly. In On Being. American Public Media.

Twenge, J. (2017, September). Have Smartphones destroyed a generation? The Atlantic.

Vaterlaus, J. M., Beckert, T. E., & Schmitt-Wilson, S. (2019). Parent-child time together: The role of interactive technology with adolescent and young adult children. Journal of Family Issues, 40(15), 2179-2202

Wartella, E., Rideout, V., Lauricella, A. R., and Connell, S. (2013). Parenting in the age of digital technology. Report for the center on media and Human development school of communication Northwestern University.

Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl, Vol. 1. Matters of public interest; Vol. 2. Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). University of Minnesota


Share This Book